2b Complete the sentences. 1) The passive is formed with the correct form of the verb the past participle. 2) We use the simple for the present passive and the simple for the past passive. 3) If we want to say who performed the we use by
I chose the second picture. The second picture shows little Red riding hood and a Gray wolf. The wolf wants to eat little Red riding hood. And little Red riding hood wants to take pies to her grandmother. On the way, she meets a Gray wolf. She told him where she was going. The gray wolf ran to her grandmother. The gray wolf ate grandma before little Red riding hood came. Next, the Gray wolf eats little Red riding hood, the hunter comes. He ripped open the belly of a Gray wolf, and little Red riding hood and her grandmother jumped out. The end.
Объяснение:
ПЕРЕВОД
Я выбрал вторую картинку. На второй картинке изображены Красная шапочка и Серый волк. Волк хочет съесть Красную шапочку. А Красная шапочка хочет отнести своей бабушке пирожки. По дороге она встречает Серого волка. Она сказала ему куда она спешит. Серый волк помчался к её бабушке. Серый волк съел бабушку до того как пришла Красная шапочка. Далее Серый волк съедает Красную шапочку, приходит охотник. Он вспорол брюхо Серому волку, и от туда выскочили Красная шапочка и её бабушка. Конец.
So...De-extinction is the process of creating an organism which is – or greatly resembles – a member of an extinct species (1). Contemporary biotechnology offers various promising alternatives for achieving this purpose, including the techniques that have already been applied to preserving endangered species (2). De-extinction requires an in-depth study of the biophysical conditions where the species can live and reproduce in relation to other species – including humans – and adapt to the environmental changes. In any case, risk and harm evaluation on the impact of the “re-birth” of species is necessary. There is a number of crucial ethical issues concerning de-extinction. They include the meanings of concepts such as “nature,” “species,” “evolution,” “biodiversity,” “death,” and “wildlife” in relation to human behavior and human impact on nature (3). In 2013, de-extinction became popular through press and public events; the National Geographic devoted a cover story to this topic and presented various possibilities and scenarios about the most suitable candidates. The Revive & Restore network, with the support of TED and in partnership with the National Geographic Society, convened the TEDxDeExtinction conference bringing together conservationists, genetic technology practitioners, scientists, and ethicists (http://www.ted.com/tedx/events/7650). Because the revival of extinct animals inspires imagination (4), de-extinction has been a topic of science fiction novels, such as John Brosnan’s Carnosaur (1984) and Michael Crichton’s Jurassic Park (1990) and their film adaptations.
Following a systematic philosophical and ethical analysis on animal de-extinction in the context of ecological restoration (3), this article analyzes de-extinction from the standpoint of bio-objectification and considers how de-extinction is a case of bio-objectification.
I chose the second picture. The second picture shows little Red riding hood and a Gray wolf. The wolf wants to eat little Red riding hood. And little Red riding hood wants to take pies to her grandmother. On the way, she meets a Gray wolf. She told him where she was going. The gray wolf ran to her grandmother. The gray wolf ate grandma before little Red riding hood came. Next, the Gray wolf eats little Red riding hood, the hunter comes. He ripped open the belly of a Gray wolf, and little Red riding hood and her grandmother jumped out. The end.
Объяснение:
ПЕРЕВОД
Я выбрал вторую картинку. На второй картинке изображены Красная шапочка и Серый волк. Волк хочет съесть Красную шапочку. А Красная шапочка хочет отнести своей бабушке пирожки. По дороге она встречает Серого волка. Она сказала ему куда она спешит. Серый волк помчался к её бабушке. Серый волк съел бабушку до того как пришла Красная шапочка. Далее Серый волк съедает Красную шапочку, приходит охотник. Он вспорол брюхо Серому волку, и от туда выскочили Красная шапочка и её бабушка. Конец.
Выпиши то что тебе нужно
So...De-extinction is the process of creating an organism which is – or greatly resembles – a member of an extinct species (1). Contemporary biotechnology offers various promising alternatives for achieving this purpose, including the techniques that have already been applied to preserving endangered species (2). De-extinction requires an in-depth study of the biophysical conditions where the species can live and reproduce in relation to other species – including humans – and adapt to the environmental changes. In any case, risk and harm evaluation on the impact of the “re-birth” of species is necessary. There is a number of crucial ethical issues concerning de-extinction. They include the meanings of concepts such as “nature,” “species,” “evolution,” “biodiversity,” “death,” and “wildlife” in relation to human behavior and human impact on nature (3). In 2013, de-extinction became popular through press and public events; the National Geographic devoted a cover story to this topic and presented various possibilities and scenarios about the most suitable candidates. The Revive & Restore network, with the support of TED and in partnership with the National Geographic Society, convened the TEDxDeExtinction conference bringing together conservationists, genetic technology practitioners, scientists, and ethicists (http://www.ted.com/tedx/events/7650). Because the revival of extinct animals inspires imagination (4), de-extinction has been a topic of science fiction novels, such as John Brosnan’s Carnosaur (1984) and Michael Crichton’s Jurassic Park (1990) and their film adaptations.
Following a systematic philosophical and ethical analysis on animal de-extinction in the context of ecological restoration (3), this article analyzes de-extinction from the standpoint of bio-objectification and considers how de-extinction is a case of bio-objectification.