I think that national symbols serve as a union of citizens, people living in a country with a certain flag, a coat of arms and a hymn clearly identify themselves in the world. And yet, national symbols, for example, the coat of arms, are used in the design of country documents. However, not all people identify myself with the national symbols of my country, including me. I respect my country, but I'm still too young to think about such cardinal and important things, so far I do not care.The main advantage is that people living in a country with certain national symbols can feel independent, they have something that no other state repeats. People identify themselves with their national symbols, and this unites all citizens. The main drawback symbols is that they are not updated often, young people are not interested in learning about the history of creating these symbols. The state literally does nothing to interest the younger generation in the history of their nationalities -regional character.
1) she told me to wash my socks every day 2) she told me to keep my passport in a safe place 3) she asked me to text her every day 4) she asked me to send her a postcard to my grandma (крайне нелогичное предложение отправь мне открытку к твоей бабушке) 5)they said they were going to spain the next day 6) they said they had packed all their luggage the day before 7) they said they would be back the following month 8) they said they travelled all around South America the year before 9) he said he hadn't got a full time job then
2) she told me to keep my passport in a safe place
3) she asked me to text her every day
4) she asked me to send her a postcard to my grandma (крайне нелогичное предложение отправь мне открытку к твоей бабушке)
5)they said they were going to spain the next day
6) they said they had packed all their luggage the day before
7) they said they would be back the following month
8) they said they travelled all around South America the year before
9) he said he hadn't got a full time job then